Jean-Marc Moutout
The French Dilemma
A review of “Violence des Echanges En Milieu Tempéré” by Frederic W. Erk
France is a land of contradiction. It is a Republic and has destroyed meritocracy. It has one of the last Communist Party in Europe, but elects reactionary and populist Sarkozy as President. French culture is elitist and exclusive, and yet the French just love American pop culture. We are a land of romantic lovers, and husbands rape and murder their wives in increasing numbers.
“The Economist” wrote in its survey of France dated 26 October 2006 that French teachers and intellectuals are leftists. This would explain the reluctance of French students to integrate the world of business. The contradiction is that France is hosting elitist Grandes Ecoles like “H.E.C” and popular Universities with radically opposed values of excellence and merit. France is “The Art of Impossible”, according to “The Economist”.
France is a land of social unrest and recurrent strikes. Winter time is for SNCF and Air France strikes. Summer is for truckers and farmers. French people are joking about Air France real job, which is to be on strike.
France has a Ministry of Culture, which is to distribute medals of merit to foreign artists and be lavish with tax payers’ money that French movie directors can make movies about French decline and American globalisation.
Film industry of France is about making movies no one wants to see. There are exceptions, though, to this rule of thumb. From time to time a French film director can make a movie, which is not about despair, suicidal intellectuals and ordinary French mediocrity. Unfortunately “Violence Des Echanges En Milieu Tempere” is not an exception to that rule.
This is the story of a young man, who goes to Paris to make a career. He meets a girl. His job is to provide consultancy services to companies in trouble. His mentor is a French ambitious Young Turk, who is making his living out of firing people and optimising profits for shareholders. The girl is leftist, anarchist and (surprise) working as flight attendant for Air France.
If the plot sounds familiar, it is because American movies have explored that subject with great assiduity and talent. Billy Wilder would have made a sarcastic masterpiece in the like of “The Apartment”. Alas, French director Jean-Marc Moutout has made a movie about a young ordinary French couple, which is discovering that living together is about sharing the same values in life.
The young apprentice in love and business will turn into a master, meaning that he will dump the girl and get promoted for firing people. His philosophy has evolved from empathy to self-pity and selfishness. Hollywood would have tried to find a balance between those two extremes. “Fun with Dick and Jane” is about two people trying to survive and who end up saving others. French ethics is the reverse. You begin with trying to save the world and end up caring for yourself only.
The movie provides a gallery of characters with a potential for elevating the story to the next level. There is the director of a workshop who is living the reorganisation of his business as a personal tragedy. He knows everyone in his team and has to choose who will stay and who will be fired. This struggle between his conscience and his loyalty is a credit to the movie. There is also the cook at the cafeteria who is dedicated to integrate French society as the son of an immigrant. His disappointment is the only tragedy of the movie.
The Spanish play “El Método” illustrated the manipulation of the individual in the sphere of business management and consultancy. It highlighted the personal choice of saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’ in a Faustian dilemma. “Violence des Echanges En Milieu Tempéré” is a movie about the contradiction in French society between its elitist entrepreneurship and socialist values of integration and justice. It could have been the movie of a personal revolt and redemption, of a fight to amend the system by adopting its rules to better combat them. Alas, it is only the statement of a society of individuals living for themselves and hoping for the best, with no vision for the future.
French films are about destructive alternatives. “La Discrète” is about love and betrayal. “Violence Des Echanges En Milieu Tempéré” is about love and business. Why could a French director not make a film about someone in love and doing better in business? France is the land of Romance, and yet French lovers are cold dilettante. What they take, they forsake it. Why are the French so pessimistic? I am dreaming of my country laughing to destiny and challenges with a grin of universal meaningfulness. Shall we have another Revolution to achieve this?


